Oct 182013
 

Everyone agrees that the Maybell site is an excellent site for senior housing, which could be the start of working toward consensus.  No one wants to see the land sold to a for-profit developer, but an alternative to the rezoning over-development will not emerge unless Measure D fails to pass.

The corporation backing Measure D, the proponent of rezoning, claims that they cannot obtain all of the grants & loans with just a 41-unit apartment building at Maybell.  But they can build the 60-unit building they want to build, without any modifications to to the existing design, through a density transfer from the rest of the land.  They also claim that their budget will not balance without the twelve luxury homes planned for two-thirds of the land.  I have been attempting to obtain evidence which prove or refute this claim since July, 2013; when and if I receive any I’ll get back to you.

If Measure D fails, the financial issues can be put on hold while the neighbors & the corporation negotiate a solution everyone can live with.  Preferably directly, without the City Council playing emperor.  If a compromise is reached, the pending lawsuits will disappear before the next City Council election.  Otherwise the discord will continue to be expensive for all in both time, money, & additional damage to the social fabric of the community.  This much-needed reconciliation will not happen unless Measure D fails, so please

vote NO on Measure D.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)